author

Automattic

zeldman (who these days works for Automattic) writes:

1,500 people. 70 countries. No office. Millions of documented words. Most companies would call this chaos. We call it Tuesday. Here’s how #Automattic turned distributed work into a communication culture that actually scales.

When you start to read the linked article, though, you learn

Quick coordination happens on Slack, project planning on Linear, code on GitHub, and real-time sync on Zoom. For drafting together we still use Google Docs, though collaborative editing is coming natively to WordPress soon.

Ceasefire

Trump was here, speaking in our living room. I managed to drown him out by shutting the door and playing loud music.

Grateful to the man for pissing on the fire before the Strip had been burned to a cinder and his weapons had killed every living soul, including the hostages. Still, it would have been nicer if this had happened a trifle sooner.

Staying sane amidst madness

It seems to me that the number one question of the hour , in modern societies, is how to adopt a sane response when we are surrounded by madness?

Here, it’s visceral and tribal; and generally unhinged. You can sense this if you detach yourself sufficiently to be aware of how people are thinking, without being swept up in popular emotion – though if you detach yourself too much, of course, you are not aware at all. Right now there seems to be a kind of euphoria. Like my daughter saw people dancing in the streets. And the news programs, which I hear in the background when I am not shutting my door or wearing earpods, try to commodify a channel the emotions. I hear statements like, “One thing’s for sure, without the amazing performance of the army, we would not be where we are now.”

Tribal manifestations of emotion are dangerous; these directly result in phenomena like a genocide. But they are widespread among human groups, and seem difficult to escape.

And then there are situations like in the U.S., where you have two polarised sub-groups, almost hermetically sealed in, so that neither of the sides is able to hear the other.

Smart people like Thich Nhat Hanh (the Buddhist monk and peace activist, who tried not to take sides during the Vietnam war) would make statements like “you can’t have a Left, without the existence of a Right”, and whenever he thought someone was wrong about something, he would begin, “What you say is partly true…” Because truth is always relative, and whatever we say is never 100% valid, or utterly mistaken.

But, it is truly hard, in a society that is exhibiting symptoms of group psychosis, to adopt measured, sane positions. A part of you wants to scream. Though if you do, no one will hear you anyway, so it’s pointless.

An Israeli friend of mine tries to adopt a position of empathy towards all people. She is fluent in Arabic (and of course Hebew) and tries to be helpful and respectful towards everyone. She says she is not a political dissident. “If you want to genocide people, go ahead. I will not be part of it.” That’s the kind of statement she will make. Of course, she’s a bit mad too, with her own hang-ups; deeply insecure and fearful, overly assertive about her own “truths” – it’s hard to tolerate her for too long.

And in Europe I myself did not find the right measure of reaction or speaking out when confronted by the complacency of others towards the genocide happening here. My voice sounded too strident, even to me. If I had been among pro-Palestinian activists, it would have been even harder, because there are extreme levels of emotion and blindness among them too.

Against Identity (book)

Started to listen to Against Identity: The Wisdom of Escaping the Self (audio book), by Alexander Douglas.

(Reviews: [Scottsman](https://www.scotsman.com/news/book-review-against-identity-by-alexander-douglas-5210001) , [Our Daily Read](https://www.scotsman.com/news/book-review-against-identity-by-alexander-douglas-5210001), [The Critic](https://thecritic.co.uk/trapped-in-an-identity-crisis/) )

It bases itself on the ideas of three disparate philosophers, Chuang Tsu (fifth century BCE), Benedict Spinoza (17th century, Netherlands) and  René Girard (20th century).

From Steven Poole’s review:

Philosopher Alexander Douglas’s deeply interesting book diagnoses our malaise, ecumenically, as a universal enslavement to identity. An alt-right rabble rouser who denounces identity politics is just as wedded to his identity as a leftwing “activist” is wedded to theirs. And this, Douglas argues persuasively, explains the polarised viciousness of much present argument. People respond to criticisms of their views as though their very identity is being attacked. The response is visceral and emotional. That’s why factchecking conspiracy theories doesn’t work. And it’s not just a social media problem; it’s far worse than that. “If you define yourself by your ethnicity or your taste in music,” Douglas argues, “then you ipso facto demarcate yourself against others who do not share in that identity. Here we have the basis for division and in

Pictorialism

I have never studied the history of photography and am ignorant of what contemporary photographers may be saying, but reading the Wikipedia article on Pictorialism gave me some ideas.

From Wikipedia:

Pictorialism is an international style and aesthetic movement that dominated photography during the later 19th and early 20th centuries. There is no standard definition of the term, but in general it refers to a style in which the photographer has somehow manipulated what would otherwise be a straightforward photograph as a means of creating an image rather than simply recording it.

There are good examples in the article itself and a Tumblr blog Ode to Pictorialism with many more.

From the 19th century till today, cameras have continued to improve and become more ubiquitous, until now they are literally in everybody’s hands all the time, while the snapping and sharing of photos has become, instantaneous, cost-free and constant.  What distinguishes an image isn’t pixel-perfect fidelity, but artistic qualities.  

In addition, our era is characterized by such a surfeit of visual data, measured in dozens of megapixels, that our brains struggle to find the salient points among the mass of detail. We seek respite and a dumbing-down of detail, which no doubt partly explains the popularity of manga, anima, and cinematic techniques like rotoscope.  As well, of course as the bokeh and portrait modes on our camera-phones and software techniques that seek to emulate these.

The pictorialists excelled at getting rid of surplus detail, using often the bare minimum necessary to create a mood or an atmosphere.  This wasn’t merely a consequence of exploiting some qualities of earlier cameras or film, but their use of deliberate darkroom techniques.

Théo Blanc and Antoine Demilly • Perrache, Cours De Verdun, Lyon, 1930

I am wondering how to apply these ideas with the equipment I have.  The problem seems to be how, at the same time, to reduce the excess detail and to create a pleasing aesthetic effect.

Ceasefire?

We desperately hope that these are now the last days of the unrestrained genocidal rampage that has continued unabated for two years. Some level of violence will certainly continue, because the only thing that has really changed is that Israel has become more brazen after witnessing the world’s indifference to its acts. There is no new psychological shift towards peace. Vis-à-vis the Palestinians, there is probably even greater surety that “if we did what we did to them, they will surely want to treat us the same, if we give them half a chance”. That’s how the cycle works.

As for the rest of the world, I don’t know how long it will take, if this thing winds down, for people’s attention to move away, and for amnesia to set in. We tend to forget about crimes in which we, or our own identity groups, are complicit. It is more convenient.

Rain

wet bench and a puddle

On my morning walk, the first shower of the season.  Found shelter at the bakery.

Photo editing

Amused myself with some digital darkroom work on recent photos, usually converting them to monocrhrome and cropping a little.  The resulting images aren’t necessarily better; just different.  

rural house among trees
rural house among trees - b&w
village street
village street - b&w
chateau - colour
chateau - b&w
farm houses
farm houses - cropped

Lies

Someone a little smarter than me should write about the different kinds of lies we are told. I see a kind of spectrum from Putin’s categorical “deny everything” strategy, which is a kind of admission of guilt; to Israel’s insistence of stringent abidance by international legal standards (statements like “Israel is and will remain a state governed by the rule of law, committed to upholding…” bla bla bla) which nobody believes any more; to Trump’s wild proclamations, which he knows his supporters will love but everyone else will pull out their hair; to keeping up the appearance of good governance, backed by a set of questionable facts – maybe cases like the Starmer government?, to lies based on the pretence that while you know your decisions are awful, you really have no choice, because the alternatives would be even worse – who? – maybe Macron?